Oh my.
I missed a whole slew of relevant stuff in the past week or so, starting with this:
Nicco Mele, the CEO at my old company, EchoDitto, recently posted this gem on his blog:
I have long admired Sen. McCain’s work on campaign finance reform and his independent streak. If Sen. McCain runs for president, he’s got my support.
…
I like Sen. McCain — I think he should be president!
Let me just say this. Nicco, who was one of the driving forces behind uber-liberal Howard Dean's internet campaign, is supporting a GOP candidate.
What the hell is this world coming to?
Not just "Oh, well, he's a moderate GOP candidate and bats for the Democrats frequently." No, McCain (who I embarrassingly admit that I once drunkenly said he might be a good alternative if the Dems didn't get their act together for the '08 election and regretted it the moment I said it), should NOT considered to be a progressive, green, Dean supporter's first choice for a presidential candidate. Good god. Especially one who is the CEO of a dedicatedly progressive political/internet consulting firm.
It's like he's giving the finger to the company's core values… because as I remember, when I first started back in June 2005, the issue on the table was whether to boycott Convio because they had recently adopted "Alliance for Marriage" as a client - which is considered to be an anti-gay foundation. But barely a year later, here's our CEO advocating McCain, who SUPPORTS a gay marriage BAN in his home state. Hypocrite, anyone?
Just because McCain is behind campaign finance reform (one of EchoDitto's passions) doesn't mean he's really a Democrat in elephant clothing. He's still the one who supports Bush's foreign policy. He thinks we should send MORE troops to Iraq. Blah blah blah. This guy does not even remotely represent EchoDitto's values, and Nicco should know better than to piss all over them by supporting McCain… because it sure as hell isn't going to help ED gain new clients.
I once saw a bumper sticker in 2004 that said "Someone else for President." I agreed with that to some degree, because at the time ANYONE would be an upgrade from Bush. But now it's not to the point of where I'm going to vote for someone because they match only some of my values but have a 60% chance of winning the presidency. If people want their elected officials to represent the values they stand for, they should not go for someone who's going to balance on the fictitious partisan fence. But that's another story…


